Yesterday was a win/lose day. Oh, I won... All of my hours, money, resources proved "he was able to do/work SOMETHING for a living", but they lowered the support by another $250 (basing it on imputed minimum wage) because I couldn't prove HOW MUCH he was making; I couldn't prove CASH. So, my choices yesterday were SOMETHING or NOTHING.
He was made out to be a deceitful and conniving. The judge described him as a WILY person, but the laws are the laws.
For those of you going through court, learn what HEARSAY is and learn the evidentiary rules are. Everything is hearsay without the actual person who wrote the article, advertisement, statistical data present in person to AUTHENTICATE the information. I spent a lot of time wasted. In the end, court is a chess game of bartering.
He was made out to be a deceitful and conniving. The judge described him as a WILY person, but the laws are the laws.
For those of you going through court, learn what HEARSAY is and learn the evidentiary rules are. Everything is hearsay without the actual person who wrote the article, advertisement, statistical data present in person to AUTHENTICATE the information. I spent a lot of time wasted. In the end, court is a chess game of bartering.